In accordance with Article 217 of the Georgian Code of Criminal Procedure, the prosecutor is obliged to consult the victim before the conclusion of the pleading agreement and to inform him accordingly. In addition, under the directives of the Prosecutor`s Office of Georgia, the prosecutor is obliged to take into account the interests of the victim and, as a rule, to conclude the plea agreement after the damage has been compensated. In the application, if the conditional suspension of the sentence provided for in Articles 163 and 163 of the Italian Criminal Code could be applied, the accused could make the application for the suspension subject; If the judge refuses the suspension, the hearing is refused. If the prosecutor and the accused have reached an agreement, the proposal is submitted to the judge who may refuse or accept the pleading. The Japanese system, officially known as the “Mutual Consultation and Agreement System” (協議 ・合意制制度, kyogi-goi seido), are available from advocacy negotiations in criminal prosecutions for organized crime, competition law offenses and economic crimes such as violations of the Securities Law. The prosecutor, the accused and the defence lawyer each sign a written agreement which must be immediately admitted into evidence before a public court.  For example, Robert Badinter argued that oral hearings would give too much power to the prosecutor and encourage defendants to accept a fair sentence to avoid the risk of a heavier sentence in a trial, even if they did not really deserve it. Only a minority of criminal cases are regulated in this way: in 2009, they were 77,500 of the 673,700 or 11.5% of criminal court decisions.  Although the appel appelon courts did not fully accept, negotiations began in the early twentieth century. A researcher pursued a guilty confession in New York County, New York, and found that between 77 and 83 percent of the defendants pleaded guilty between 1900 and 1907. Two scientists in the 1920s discovered that Plea Bargains had become standard practice in other jurisdictions. In Cook County, Illinois, for example, 96 percent of prosecutions in 1926 led to a confession of guilt. Taken together, these five cases illustrate the Court`s view that remedies are acceptable and deserve to be recognized as valid agreements.
Indeed, in Santobello, the Court went so far as to affirm that the hearing of the grounds of appeal was “not only an essential part of the trial, but a highly desirable part for many reasons”. Plea Bargains has thus become a well-established and protected routine. The absence of forced prosecutions also gives prosecutors greater discretion, as well as the inability of victims of a private action to bring a private action and their limited ability to influence pleading agreements.  Defendants who are in custody – either not entitled to bail, cannot afford bail or who cannot be released on their own – may be released from prison immediately after the judge accepts a plea.  Even if the charges are more serious, defense prosecutors and their clients can often still plead guilty to a lesser offense. As a result, people who could have been acquitted for lack of evidence, but who are truly innocent, will often plead guilty. What for? In a word, fear. And the more numerous and serious the accusations, as studies have shown, the greater the fear. This explains why prosecutors sometimes seem to bring all possible charges against defendants.  A Plea Bargaining, also known as the Plea Agreement or Negotiated Plea, is an alternative and consensual way of resolving criminal cases. A plea agreement means a settlement of the case without a main trial if the accused agrees to plead guilty in exchange for a lesser charge, a lighter sentence, or a dismissal of certain related charges.
. . .